It seems the real measure of fraud for these programs is the fraction of applicants that use the vector to enter the US and then "skip bail" and don't show up when their case for asylum is considered. This seems a easy number to calculate, so why is this not used as the gold standard for measuring the effectiveness of these kinds of programs?
And if the measure is calculated, then what number have we found? what percent use this path to remain illegally? Any references for me? thanks! --dan
Alex:
It seems the real measure of fraud for these programs is the fraction of applicants that use the vector to enter the US and then "skip bail" and don't show up when their case for asylum is considered. This seems a easy number to calculate, so why is this not used as the gold standard for measuring the effectiveness of these kinds of programs?
And if the measure is calculated, then what number have we found? what percent use this path to remain illegally? Any references for me? thanks! --dan