Trump's nationalist and discriminatory politics are creating poverty both in the USA and world-wide. Such decisions are not only arbitrary and inhumane but also denying rights and freedom to humans only because one is born in a certain country
We have immigrated over 100 million people in the last 30 years. Why do we need more, this just adds to our carbon footprint and drives inflation with demand for food and goods outstripping supply
That is really stupid and ignorant since you are misusing a global problem to justify authoritarian politics. The carbon footprint needs to be lower worldwide through changes of politics, markets and lifestyels , regardless of migration.
In 2023, the average carbon footprint per person in the United States was approximately 14.8 metric tons of CO₂-equivalent. In contrast, the average carbon footprint per person in Ecuador in 2021 was estimated to be 4.0 tonnes of CO₂e. This places Ecuador at 105th out of 191 countries in terms of emissions per capita.
Therefore, the carbon footprint per person in the US is significantly higher than in Ecuador. The US average per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (17.9 t CO₂e) are more than double the global average (6.8 t CO₂e).
The Global problem is the huge carbon footprint of the USA and Europe. Iyt would be better to migrate people from the USA to Ecuador to reduce the carbon footprint. I am not stupid BTW, and am a profesional registered engineer.
I still think that your proposal and thought is stupid and bigoted because you could use the same idea against Americans migrating from villages and towns to bigger cities as New York or Los Angeles. You are soudning as a eco-fascist or right-wing populist who is misuing climate against humans. Climate problems are still global and need global solutions just as migration.
Trump's nationalist and discriminatory politics are creating poverty both in the USA and world-wide. Such decisions are not only arbitrary and inhumane but also denying rights and freedom to humans only because one is born in a certain country
We have immigrated over 100 million people in the last 30 years. Why do we need more, this just adds to our carbon footprint and drives inflation with demand for food and goods outstripping supply
What?
Are you using environmental arguments against migration despite that climate and environment are gobal issues?
Yes as a person in the USA has a much larger carbon footprint than Mexico or South America. Move them here and they consume more.
That is really stupid and ignorant since you are misusing a global problem to justify authoritarian politics. The carbon footprint needs to be lower worldwide through changes of politics, markets and lifestyels , regardless of migration.
In 2023, the average carbon footprint per person in the United States was approximately 14.8 metric tons of CO₂-equivalent. In contrast, the average carbon footprint per person in Ecuador in 2021 was estimated to be 4.0 tonnes of CO₂e. This places Ecuador at 105th out of 191 countries in terms of emissions per capita.
Therefore, the carbon footprint per person in the US is significantly higher than in Ecuador. The US average per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (17.9 t CO₂e) are more than double the global average (6.8 t CO₂e).
The Global problem is the huge carbon footprint of the USA and Europe. Iyt would be better to migrate people from the USA to Ecuador to reduce the carbon footprint. I am not stupid BTW, and am a profesional registered engineer.
I still think that your proposal and thought is stupid and bigoted because you could use the same idea against Americans migrating from villages and towns to bigger cities as New York or Los Angeles. You are soudning as a eco-fascist or right-wing populist who is misuing climate against humans. Climate problems are still global and need global solutions just as migration.