With these sorts of restricted domestic guest worker visas one worries about abuse (physical, sexual, etc) by in-home employers, especially given the Gulf states' notoriety for abusing guest workers. Do we have reason to believe Singapore has avoided this problem? If so, how did they do it?
A central principle of Singapore's immigration policy is to maintain the racial balance of the country, similar to the United States' 1924 immigration law.
With these sorts of restricted domestic guest worker visas one worries about abuse (physical, sexual, etc) by in-home employers, especially given the Gulf states' notoriety for abusing guest workers. Do we have reason to believe Singapore has avoided this problem? If so, how did they do it?
The Gulf states abuse women in general. The in home employers just gives them more options. On the other hand, Singapore is a rule of law country.
A central principle of Singapore's immigration policy is to maintain the racial balance of the country, similar to the United States' 1924 immigration law.
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10106043/3/Frost_Singapore%20revised%20300320.pdf
Would this still work in America, which was birth right citizenship?